Skip to content
The GLP-1 Verdict
Menu

Research

Evidence-based research

A Verdict Score is a judgement, and a judgement is worth exactly as much as what sits under it. This is what sits under ours: 27 guides carrying 50 distinct primary sources — 28 peer-reviewed studies plus FDA labelling and the regulatory record — alongside the pricing research behind all 509 provider rulings. Medical and mechanism claims here are cited to a primary source or they are not made. How the six factors are weighted against each other is set out in our published methodology.

27

research guides

50

distinct primary sources

28

peer-reviewed studies

The medicine

What the molecules do, what the pivotal trials actually showed, and what separates an FDA-approved product from a compounded one. Every efficacy and regulatory claim in this group is cited to a primary source.

The market, and what it costs

What a month of compounded GLP-1 really costs across the providers we track, and how the regulatory ground under compounded supply has shifted underneath those prices.

Dispatches: providers we screened but do not rank

Seven telehealth sellers screened together in August 2026. None is a partner, none carries a commercial link, and none sits on our scored board. Each dispatch records the price ladder as published, the terms sitting underneath it, and what could not be verified — including two providers we would tell most readers to walk away from.

How we judge a provider

The rubric itself, and the checklist a reader can run without us. These two explain what the Verdict Score measures and why those six things rather than another six.

Also in the library

Where the research meets the rulings

The evidence above decides what a good programme looks like; the 509 provider verdicts decide which ones clear the bar. Pricing is the half that has to be re-read rather than cited: figures come from each provider's own live pages, they carry the condition attached to them, and when we read one back against the provider's site and find it wrong we correct it in public. Who writes this, and how corrections are handled, is in our editorial policy.